Build the employer brief
Census, renewal, locations, funding goals, employee support needs and operational constraints.
Not every contribution strategy fits every ICHRA vendor. Our Third Party Vendor Analysis compares your proposed allowances, employee classes, payment model and employee needs, then evaluates the administrator and ancillary benefits that can work together for your group.
We review which vendors can support your contribution approach, permitted classes, reimbursement or payment needs and enrollment experience. We also compare the ancillary mix—dental, vision, life, disability, HSA and other benefits where appropriate—so the components fit together.
Confirmed for each live case: administrator capabilities, eligibility and class rules, product availability, payroll connectivity, service responsibilities and total fees. Ancillary products may use separate carriers or administrators; a matrix score alone does not confirm compatibility.
Adjust the priorities. The matrix recalculates the weighted fit of complete proposals, while scope confirmation keeps unqualified options out of the shortlist.
Weights normalize automatically.
Try the sample proposals, or replace them with actual RFP responses. Rate each capability from 1 (limited fit) to 5 (strong fit). A vendor must meet the required scope and have complete inputs to rank.
| Proposal & evidence | Enrollment 1–5 | Payments 1–5 | Payroll 1–5 | Broker control 1–5 | Reporting 1–5 | Fees ($) | Weighted fit |
|---|
Keep group coverage for one employment class and model ICHRA for another. Change the class counts, monthly employer costs and funding paths to compare the budget.
| Employment class | Employees | Funding path | Current employer cost $/employee/month | ICHRA allowance $/employee/month | ICHRA admin $/employee/month |
|---|
All-ICHRA alternative using these allowances and admin fees: / year. Figures assume full use of the monthly allowances; exclude setup, consulting, brokerage, stop-loss changes and other costs not entered. This is an employer-cost comparison, not a premium quote or a savings guarantee.
This workspace calculates from illustrative or user-entered inputs. Nothing is submitted automatically. Upload your actual renewal and RFP for a case-specific comparison.
We use the matrix to structure the decision, then confirm the facts directly with the employer, vendors and available market evidence.
Census, renewal, locations, funding goals, employee support needs and operational constraints.
Market availability, service scope, payments, payroll, broker roles, privacy and implementation responsibilities.
Show current proposal evidence and full costs, then test how priorities and class scenarios affect fit.
Review the shortlist, plan design, pricing, contracts, class rules and launch responsibilities.
Inclusion identifies an option to investigate, not a verified capability rating, carrier appointment or universal recommendation.
Upload your existing RFP, census, current plan, renewal rates and contributions.